Norway

Creating a dramatic Black-And-White Landscape image

I've shown you a lot of landscapes so far on this blog, but I haven't shown you how they end up here. Some images are simple, requiring minimal editing to produce nice results; some take hours. In this post, I'll show you how I edited one of the images I took in Norway, all the way from raw capture to final result.

I use Lightroom CC for my editing, but you can do all of this in Lightroom 5 or 6, or even pure Photoshop (as long as you have the Adobe Camera RAW plugin installed). Since I shoot all my landscapes excplicitely with post-processing in mind, I always shoot in 14-bit RAW format. JPEG simply doesn't allow me to do even half of the edits I usually do. I always take care to expose for the highlights when I take a photo. That means making sure that no areas of the photo are blown out (the sun being an exception). If you want to take landscape photos, and don't have the highlight warning blinkies turned on, shame on you! :)

Without further ado, here is the final image:

And here is the RAW file exported to JPEG with no processing whatsoever:

Note that the ground is a little bit dark; this is normal when exposing for the highlights when it's cloudy. Don't worry. As they say, we'll fix it in post ;)

OK, let's get started. The very first thing I do, is go to the 'Develop tab' in Lightroom, and go down to 'Lens Corrections'. Here, I check 'Enable Profile Corrections' and 'Remove Chromatic Aberration'. The first setting makes Lightroom correct for any deficiencies in my lens (in this case it was the Nikon 10-24 DX), mainly vignetting and barrel distortion. The second removes unwanted colors around high-contrast edges, which is also a defect of most lenses.

Corrections applied. Not a big difference on the final image, but especially chromatic aberrations show really well in prints if you don't remove them.

There is quite a big difference between the light and dark parts of the image; especially the mountain on the right is too dark. In real life the mountain was very dark, but it doesn't translate that well to the image. In my opinion, it's OK to modify your images. I'm still going to keep it natural, just not the way it actually looked ;)

To lessen the dynamic range (the difference between light and dark) I'm going to use a trick I learned from Sergio Ramelli of YouTube fame. He is very fond of the method, but I think it doesn't always work; in this case, it does. First, go to the 'Basic' tab. Take the 'Highlights' slider, and drag it all the way to the left. This makes light areas darker. Then, take the 'Shadows' slider, and drag it all the way to the right. This lightens up dark areas. The end result looks like this:

What we did was squish all tones towards the middle, making the picture look a bit washed out. Next, we'll fix the blandness using the 'Whites' and 'Blacks' sliders. You can drag these by just looking at the image and seeing the changes, but there is a better way; using the Alt key on your keyboard. Press down the Alt key and grab the 'Whites' slider. You'll notice the image goes black; don't worry. Move the slider towards the right, until small specks of white appear in the image area. Let go of the slider and the Alt key, and you'll see your picture again.

Tiny hint of blue where the clouds are, this is good.

Now, do the same with the 'Blacks' slider, but drag it to the left. The image will be white; stop when you get some black areas, and release.

You can go a bit farther with the black than the whites. As you can see, the lake is the darkest part in this image.

What we did was change the white and black point of your image; the lightest part, and the darkest part. When using the Alt key, Lightroom shows you the areas that are pure white and black, respectively. You always want a little bit pure white and pure black in the images, this helps with perceived contrast. Let's take a look at our image after the adjustment.

Much better than the last, right? It is basically the same as the first image, but we've added contrast. Now, you could do this with the 'Contrast' slider, but I find the results aren't nearly as good. Still with me? Good, then lets do the last bit of global adjustments before we pause and take stock. I do this by adding a touch of 'Clarity', 'Vibrance' and 'Contrast'. How much depends completely on the picture. I usually just eyeball it until it looks good, then take away about 10-20%. Your eyes deceive you into thinking you haven't gone too far, but trust me, you will. If you can pause at this point and come back the next day, do it. It will help you dial back on the heavy processing you are doing right now. I typically try to do two passes, where the second is during another day. Very often I realize my settings are too strong. For now, you can see my eyeballed settings for the three down below, with the end result.

The difference is again quite small. Editing is often about adding small changes, letting the sum of the changes have a big impact. 

So, at this point we have a nice image, that could be printed and hang on the wall. But when I edited this, I had a couple of thoughts. One, I really liked the road form going down toward the lake and round it. Two, the scene is dramatic, but could be made more so. Three, There is not a lot of color information in the image. Granted, the colors are true to life, but I ended up trying something I usually do when there isn't that much color; I go black and white.

B&W is great for showing form and light; by not having colors in the image, the brain has less distractions to worry about. However, it also means you have to pay much more attention to the light and dark areas (contrast) of you picture, as well as the relationship between lines and forms.

You can go back and forth between color and b&w by clicking the captions. By default, Lightroom chooses the shown mix for black and white conversions; it looks more natural than a flat curve. You can of course change the mix if you prefer.

You can go back and forth between color and b&w by clicking the captions. By default, Lightroom chooses the shown mix for black and white conversions; it looks more natural than a flat curve. You can of course change the mix if you prefer.

OK, I can work with this. First thing I did was pump up 'Contrast' and 'Clarity'¨. These sliders work extremely well in black and white, so you have more leeway in using them without the image looking unnatural. Increasing the values for both give us much more contrast, which translates to mood:

The next thing I wanted to fix was the road. I love the form, but I can't really see it. The rocks are a bit too distracting, and the road itself has the same tone as the rocks so it doesn't separate from the clutter. There are a couple of ways to solve this, but I chose a simple method. To reduce the clutter of the rocks, lower contrast and clarity on them. To bring out the road, increase contrast between the road and the rocks by making the road darker and the rocks brighter.

Time for the brush tool, then. For those of you not familiar with brushes, don't worry. Basically what I'm doing is localized changes that you can edit after the fact. If you mess up, you can undo anything. I'll start by selecting the brush tool and making sure the settings for the brush itself is OK. The effects do not matter at all at this point; I can change them in any way I like afterward. With brushes, you want to have a light touch, so I chose values around 75 for 'Flow' and 'Density'. For the size, I adjust it continually with my mouse wheel while I'm painting; big areas get a big brush, while small areas need a smaller brush. Lastly i press the 'O' key to turn on 'Show selected mask overlay'. You can also do this in the toolbar below the image. Now, start painting:

You can see the painted area above. Each click and drag will add a little more color. Remember, you are not painting the color, the color only shows you what you selected for your adjustments that will be done later. Carefully go through the area you want to change, in my case I started with the rocks in the foreground and between the bends in the road. When done, the selection looked like this:

If you paint on something you didn't intend to paint on, it's easy to fix; In the brush menu, you can select the 'Erase' brush, which does exactly what you'd expect. The same exact thing can also be found using the Alt key; when pressed, you are using the erase brush. To turn off the red mask, press 'O' again.

Now, the next thing is to do the actual adjustment. Remember, what I wanted was to reduce the contrast and make the rocks lighter, so lets do exactly that:

Add a bit of 'Exposure', drop 'Contrast' and 'Clarity'.

Add a bit of 'Exposure', drop 'Contrast' and 'Clarity'.

Next, let's do the road. We will need a new brush for this, because we don't want to mess up the changes we just did to the rocks. In the top right of the brush panel, select 'New'. This allows you to start painting a completely new area, that will have different settings. This time, paint only the road:

I wanted to darken the road, so lets do that:

'Exposure' and 'Contrast' darken the road, while 'Clarity' helps keep some of the detail.

'Exposure' and 'Contrast' darken the road, while 'Clarity' helps keep some of the detail.

There are a lot of things I could still do; the rocks in the foreground could have even less contrast, the water in the lake could be smoother, etc. I spent around an hour on the real version of this image, fixing small things like the reflections of the snow in the lake. I've ordered a big print for my wall, I think It will look amazing :) For this post, I think I'll stop here.

Thanks for reading, and please join me in the next one, where I create a high dynamic range (HDR) image!

 

 

 

Day 9: all good things must come to an end, or do they?

The last day was finally here. To be honest, I welcomed it. As magnificent as the trip had been, I was looking forward to going home. 8 days, almost a thousand kilometers in the car and the bad beds had made an impact. I was very, very tired. 

The last days drive was quite uneventful. Partly because I was tired, an partly because the terrain flattened as I drove westwards to Bergen. I had seen landscapes that were so much nicer just a day ago, so I decided to keep on driving instead. The only place I stopped properly was Nærøyfjorden; and even there, I didn't take many pictures.

The way home.

Nærøyfjorden, part of the Sogne fjord system.

Nærøyfjorden, port of Gudvangen.

So, instead of talking about the non-interesting travel home, I'll talk a little about my feelings about the trip instead. As I write this, it's been three months since I got back. Of the 2800+ images I took I still have exactly 1000 left, and I should pare them down even more. So, was it worth the time and the money? Absolutely. Will I go back? Maybe.

As great as Jotunheimen is, I feel that I've seen it now. Don't get me wrong, If someone offered, I'd take a second trip in a heartbeat. Spending a couple of weeks in the Mountains near Geiranger or Jotunheimen proper would be awesome. But I want to see other places as well. Lofoten, for instance. Or the whole North-Western coast of Norway (see  e.g. here).

Better than blue skies, I think.

Hafslovatnet. I think.

Reflections in Jolstravatn

So, what was the greatest, nicest, most beautiful thing during the whole trip? The answer is, I don't know. I can't decide. I can give you a non-ordered list of absolutely gorgeous places, though; Fannaråken, Jotunheimen highlands, Geiranger highlands, Utladalen, and some of the Sogne fjord corners such as Nærøyfjorden and Lustrafjorden. I went primarily to see and experience proper mountains, and boy, did I. It was an experience of a lifetime, truly, and I'm already thinking on where to go next.

What about the trip format? Driving from place to place, and visiting multiple places instead of just a few? Well, I'd say that it worked quite well. And even though it rained quite often, I still think I got lucky with the weather (especially on Fannaråken!). It could have been so much worse. I knew it was a risk going so late in the summer, but it was a calculated risk. I don't mind cold, and I do mind tourists, even though I am one. I planned the trip so that I had the best combination of low tourists, sunset colors (see Fannaråken post for that), and still somewhat good weather. I bet the landscapes are different during the summer or winter, but looking back I got a sort of ominous feeling in many shots that I think suits the majestic landscapes well. As many landscape photographers will tell you, blue skies are almost the worst you can have :)

My trusty rented steed in its usual position, waiting for me to do my thing.

Sheep and Sogne fjord.

As for driving around, I think that it was the right thing to do for the first trip. I had no idea of what the terrain would look like, or where the real points of interest were. Covering as much ground as possible posed a real risk if the weather turned crappy the single day I had for a particular shot, but it was a risk I had to take. If I were to go back, and I definitely will at some point, I would pick two or three locations and stay there multiple days instead, exploring the area. I would probably pick Jotunheim (the area around Prestesteinsvatnet) and the area before Geiranger (around Breiddalsvatnet) from the places I visited for that; but there are lots of places that I didn't get to as well. So, now that I've seen everything I know what to concentrate on. 

What would I change? That's a tough one.. One thing would be to spend a day at Besseggen, traversing the ridge from end to end. Or at least taking some pics from the highest point. The most important thing though would not have to do with my planning, or gear, or the route; it would be to take more time shooting. And I don't mean taking more photos, I mean taking less. Thinking through the shot, taking time to align things, and so forth. I've realized I've come a long way in how I shoot, but I still have a lot to learn in finding compositions and replacing those 50 shots from a location with one amazing one. Not that taking multiple shots is bad, sometimes you get lucky (the Sognefjord image in the previous post being one; I'm embarrassed at how sloppy I was when I took it. It was a total fluke it turned out as good as it did). Part of it was the format of the trip; driving along roads and leaving the engine running while running out to the side of the road to take the shot doesn't encourage you to take your time. But it is an excuse; I can do better, and I will try to in the future.

On the road back from Geiranger

Very typical view of Sogne fjord. The trick is to find an angle without the road, and still get some foreground.

So, what's next? As I mentioned, I still need to pair down the photos a bit, but I think I'm pretty much done with this trip otherwise. Just have to place an order for some big prints to put in my new office, I think (60x40cm aluminium prints, I'll do a post on that later). What about other trips, then? Definitely. After Norway, I already was on a two week trip to Santa Cruz, California, and I took some great pics there too. So I think I will do a bit of a redesign of this blog, making it a continuous thing instead of just dedicated to the Norway trip. I also have a post planned for gear, and at least two for post-processing. I also have earlier photos, that I might do posts on; some from my cottages in the archipelago, some semi-macro insect shots, and even a week-long photography workshop on Lanzarote from almost two years ago, if I'm brave enough to show my very early work.

So, lots to do, and lots of things to come. I also have a couple of weeks of vacation left to take before summer, and I don't know how to use them. I was eyeing a photo workshop in Iceland, but it is too expensive. Next year, maybe. I might just take the time off to take photos of eagles at our cottage, who knows. But if you made it his far, thank you. I really appreciate it. I'm humbled that people take the time to read the stories of an amateur just doing what he loves.

And lastly, a couple of sneak peeks:

Turku archipelago, taken at our cottage.

Damselfly, I think. Not very good with naming the things I shoot, sorry :)

Sunset in Santa Cruz.

Day 8: back on (the) track

The next day was perfect; sunshine, some clouds, and even though the temperature was barely over freezing, it somehow suited the landscape perfectly. After a quick breakfast I took another walk around the little collection of huts, this time seeing the mountains in the background.

This is Norway.

Cold and windy, but oh so beautiful.

The view was amazing, and it cheered me up immensely. For one of the last times, I packed my stuff and headed out. My destination was the Utladalen valley, In the middle of prime Jotunheimen territory. The valley is over 20 kilometers long and features some spectacular views, primarily 3 of the biggest waterfalls of the region.

From lake Tyin to Flåm. The straight bit on the left is a single tunnel, 27 kilometers long. Quite an experience, that. Lots of those on this day...

From lake Tyin to Flåm. The straight bit on the left is a single tunnel, 27 kilometers long. Quite an experience, that. Lots of those on this day...

The drive to Utladalen was a quick one, but before I got to the parking lot of the valley I had to drive down through Øvre Årdal. The road comes from the plateau, and goes straight for the sheer cliff face, turning at the last second. I'm not kidding, the serpentine road going down has to go into the mountain on each turn, because there isn't room to build the supports for the road on the mountainside! Pure craziness, but I can totally understand why they live there:

Øvre Årdal, from a passing point on the serpentine road.

Not photoshopped. The sun hits waterfalls in the cliff side to create the strangest scene yet.

The Utladalen area starts at a parking lot, just besides the first waterfall, Hjellefossen. Pics of that one later, as the sun was directly on top of it when I arrived. The area seems popular with locals too, as the parking lot was almost completely full. From the parking lot, a small road continues up through the valley. At the beginning there is a tourist cafe and some sort of museum (no idea, it's not what I went there for :) ). The real fun starts a couple of hundred meters after the cafe, where the road starts following the valley river. And what a river.

The valley is surprisingly narrow, with very, very high walls; often more than half a kilometer straight up. Walking through it was one of the most awesome experiences on the whole trip. After about five hundred meters, you get to the second waterfall; Avdalsfossen. Described as the most picturesque of the three, its 173 meter fall is quite something.

Avdalsfossen. Apparently, during winter, people climb up the frozen waterfall for sport. Nice.

As I continued the walk, I just couldn't fathom the sheer size of the valley. My eyes had trouble focusing on the trees on the cliff walls, believing them to be much closer than they actually were. The valley only looks narrow because of the crazy high walls surrounding it. The scale is something I'm just not used to. I'd love to be, though :)

The trees on the top are just as big as the ones on the bottom...

Hidden lagoon along the river.

The walk to the last waterfall, Vettisfossen, is quite a long one. The GPS measured 6,7 kilometers from the parking lot to the waterfall. The first 4 kilometers or so are on a proper road, as there is a farm in the middle of the valley. After the farm, the road becomes a rocky path through the forest. As it had been raining, it was quite slippery in places. I didn't mind though, I had done worse just a few days before. And the view more than made up for it.

Quite the workout for those poor cows.

Yeah. Told you.

Can't remember where this path went, but it was not for me to take. Luckily.

As I (obviously) hadn't been here before, I had no idea where the waterfall actually was. I knew it was on the same (right) side of the valley I was, but you can't really see it from the path. You start hearing a faint roar, and then you just stumble on it, nestled into the mountainside. The path takes you right underneath the waterfall; if you want to, you can get really wet.

Where Avdalsfossen is 173 meters high, partially broken up, Vettisfossen is 275 meters, unbroken. The roar is absolutely deafening. It's difficult to convey the sheer size of the falls in photographs, since you are so close to it, but here goes:

Oh, hi...

Vettisfossen. The trees on the top show some scale. There is a path to get up there, I might try that sometime.

Vettisfossen, long exposure. Can't decide if I like the previous, chaotic version, or this imposed calmness. Lugging around a heavy tripod? So worth it.

Panorama stitch. Not perfect since I had to use such a wide angle, but I'm not complaining :)

After taking the images and eating a few snacks, I started my trek back. The view was the same as before, so no pics of that, but I did stop at the waterfall beside the parking lot. The sun had moved just enough to get some light on it, but it would have been better a few hours after. Alas, I had to get to Flåm, so I just snapped the pic and got in my car.

Hjellefossen, taken from the road to Utladalen.

I continued driving south towards Flåm. The Sogne fjord again presented itself to me, and I couldn't resist. I could spend a year photographing the fjord, too bad the landscape photography business is such a congested profession.

Sogne fjord, south of Utladalen.

I had one stop still to make that day, and that was Stegastein, near Aurland. It is a similar vantage point to Eagles Turn in Geiranger; you drive up a very fun road and stop at the top, ooing and aaing. Unfortunately it was midday, the sun was high in the sky, and in the worst possible place to take a photograph from the vantage point. If you are going to go there, do it in the morning, I still regret not driving back the next day. Sunset could be nice too, during summer the sun goes down in this direction:

View due north-west from Stegastein. See the boat on the left?

After Stegastein I drove back down to my hostel. I ate dinner at a fantastic restaurant in the village center. Turns out the owners were Estonian, so I spoke Finnish with my waiter the whole evening. Small world.

The next day was the last day of my trip. Not many pictures from that day, but I'll add them to a final post anyway. I'll probably also list the highlights of the trip, along with some insights I had during the trip itself, and after. I might follow up with a gear post too, or post-processing. We'll see. But all that is for later, there is still one day to cover.