Spring is a great time if you love nature. Especially in Finland; suddenly it’s light until 9, 10 and 11 PM. The sun shines, the air is warm and everything starts getting green again. And yet, exactly this time of year is a sort of gap time for me.
There is no ice on the sea or the shores, so the seascapes are boring. Sunset and sunrise (especially) are suddenly at ridiculous times of day. It’s slightly too cold for grasses or any plants to grow, so it’s not green yet. There are no insects, and the birds haven’t moved back from the South yet.
But, it’s a good time to look back at the previous year and come up with plans for the current one. I also go through my photos and create my yearly book of highlights. It is going to be interesting this year, because as I said in my last post, I felt like I was in a rut for a good while. But it’s not ready yet, so I’ll leave you in suspense. Instead, here are a few photos I’ve actually taken during a few months while waiting for so called better conditions.
The first set was taken up North where there still is some snow. I think they illustrate the ‘seeing’ and ‘feeling’ I talked about in the last post quite well. How do I see? What do I feel? Let’s start with something that didn’t work out.
I had a vision. Heavy snowfall, traditional Finnish forest, and simplicity. So when it started snowing heavily I had to figure out where I could find minimalism; the middle of a frozen lake. It took me quite a while to walk out there, but I knew I wouldn’t get a good perspective from anywhere else. I had a picture in mind, but despite trying hard, the above wasn’t it. So; what works, what doesn’t?
I love the streaking snowfall (took me around 20 shutter speed tests to get it right, this was at 1/15th of a second). I like the island and I like the positioning of it, smack in the middle. But. The foreground branch does not work as a foreground. It’s way too small and/or too far away. Most people don’t understand what it is immediately (it’s a marker for a fishing net under the ice). And then the big problem; there aren’t many elements, but this image is not minimal. It’s the background. Even though the falling snow helps a lot with subject separation, the background still clutters the image too much. I don’t feel the image conveys what I want. So, I gave up and moved a bit.
More streaking snow, dramatic(-ish) skies, traditional Finnish lakeside houses and a mast for interest; you can see the top of the mast is covered in cloud, that’s deliberate. I like this one, but still not what I was looking for. Minimalism, remember? Next scene was this:
Two things drew me to this; the just-right amount of snow on the trees on the right. And the utter, beautiful, white emptiness behind them. I knew this was the best I could find, but how to compose such a scene? The trees on the right continued all round to the right; on the left, there was some open lake and the island from the first photo. And, as you can see, there were skiers out and about. Do I want a person in the shot?
I’m a firm believer in the following statement; in the right conditions and the right place, landscape photography becomes child’s play. The difficulty, and it is sometimes extremely difficult, is to be at the right place at the right time. Most of the time, you’ll fail. But when the stars align and everything comes together, it just takes a single shutter press to capture your vision.
I also have a version without a skier if I change my mind later; but for now this is it, this is my choice. And I created it, by careful thought from idea to execution. There is no photoshopping whatsoever. The whiteout is natural; the other shore is 10+ kilometers away. The snow streaks are subtle but clearly visible. There are no distractions anywhere, yet enough detail to keep interest. And the skier makes it a pure form of Finland; despite hostile and miserable conditions, we press on. Also, did you notice the image isn’t black-and-white?
Landscapes are what I love most; the grueling aspect of finding the correct place, waiting for the correct time and weather, and snapping a single moment in time to remember it. But nature is more than that; nature is also about the life in it. Right now, nature is awakening and the first birds have just managed to find their way back to Finland. There are animals to photograph, if you can find them, but most animals will start moving around after a few weeks. At my level, my plan for animals is ‘find them’. Not the best plan, but it’s something I can do.
I’d love to photograph e.g. foxes, but I can honestly say I don’t know where my local foxes hang out. So, for now, I just take images of birds I see while I’m out. And, the more photos you take (with intention), the more chance there is that you’ll get lucky. Some of those shots might even convey a feeling, or your vision. But for now, I’m just practicing keeping any animal in my viewfinder for long enough to take a picture. Soon, spring will be here in full force, and I need to be ready. Having one image out of literally hundreds turn out OK is a nice bonus though.
Getting a great photo is not just about luck. You have to know why you’re taking the image first, before you press the shutter. You have to feel it. Most of the time you won’t be satisfied with what you got, and that needs to be OK. Sometimes, you will be in the right place at the right time. When that happens, don’t hesitate, don’t second-guess. If you’ve taken enough bad photos, you know what to do to take a good one instinctively. In the meantime, keep on going out, keep on looking for animals and landscape locations, and keep an eye on the forecast. And don’t judge yourself for not liking your own work; figure out why you don’t, and do it better next time. When you have a vision, the rest will come naturally.